I WILL WRITE NO MORE FOREVER
These words have been circling in my mind for the last week or so. They are a paraphrase of the last words of Chief Joseph of the Nez Pierce explaining his decision to finally surrender. It is a searing speech you can read here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chief_Joseph
The catalyst for me was the recent article in The New Yorker about the struggles and eventual suicide of author David Foster Wallace. But the thought, the question, has been with me for a while, since I finished my last book I guess.
I have been wondering if there is a time for a writer to stop. To say I have written what has been given to me and now I will be silent. To say I will write no more forever.
Posted by Stephen Evans at 3/18/2009 9:25 PM 
Categories: The Meaning of Life
Tags: David Foster Wallace suicide
Categories: The Meaning of Life
Tags: David Foster Wallace suicide
I've thought along the same lines regarding my art now and then, as in, 'I will PAINT no more, forever.'
However i'm currantly reading 'The Age of American Unreason' by Susan Jacoby, who in it pursuades me that the willful ignorance, lack of conversational skills and above all, the absense of a reading populace has horribly devistated our nation. If then, literature is to be seen as a fight against the decline of civilization, those who do write well must continue, as a duty, both to our species future, and to our cultured forbears. All that remains is for us to get some fun out of the creative process. Once that goes, the jig is up.
Reply to this
I'm glad someone else feels this way. And I agree wholeheartedly with your assessment. But my feeling is really more a reaction to the internal pressures - writing for a reason, finding something you are passionate enough about to make the years long effort to make something worthwhile and original. I feel lucky to have found that a few times so far and I have been wondering how many of those we get. I wonder too, now that you mention it - is it different for a visual artist?
Reply to this
i don't think so. People have said to me that they didn't like Picasso. Well which Picasso style do they mean? He originated so many. You appreciated Sci-fi early. I think it unrecognized as todays response as philosophical literature with broader plot possibilities than Russian novels. I think it's easier for painters, we can just slap paint till we like it, a writers got to be good to be heard all the way through and passed along. I'll go thru long periods of not painting but i still consider myself to be 'at work', as i'm sure you do. I bet that when a writer stumbles across the right chunk of marble his head, all the stuff that he's cogitated on that fits, finds it's way to print. As for how many of those times we get, well, that's up to your longevity and the fire in your belly. Today, if someone can't find something to be passionate enough to work for, they're either blind or stupid. You are neither. I leave the originality up to you. To brutally mangle, paraphrasing Picasso, - 'borrow if yer gonna mess around, stealing is art'. Everything is derivative in some way. All we can hope for is to make ourselves happy and the world a tiny bit better.
Reply to this
Maybe you should be the writer. But then I would have to be the painter and that would never work.
I always preferred Braque myself.
Reply to this
Matiesse - "Get a job, keep your art pure"
Writers and painters both must be insane. Nobody reads anymore and the only people who buy paintings doso for an 'investment'.
Reply to this